+(0)800-80808800 welcome@konfliktmanagement1923.com
Qualification Architecture
Level 1 — Competency Foundation
Communication Conflict Analysis Facilitation Mediation Governance Decision-Making Law
Level 2 — Role Profiles  ·  Level 3 — Specialisations
AI Governance & Conflict Specialist
  • AI Governance & Compliance
  • Algorithmic Decision Logics
  • Digital Transformation
  • Technology, Law & Organisation
Facilitator
  • Participatory Formats
  • Process Architecture
  • Group Decision-Making
  • Anticipatory Process Design
Mediator
  • Mediation Procedures
  • Interests & Positions
  • Escalation in Process
  • Limits of Mediation
Conflict Decision Specialist
  • Decision Logics
  • Strategic Conflict Assessment
  • Responsibility & Uncertainty
  • Law, Power & Conflict
International Adjudicator
  • Foundations of International Law
  • Rules of Procedure
  • Cross-Border Contexts
  • Arbitration & Adjudication
“The five qualifications differ not primarily in content, but in their logic of intervention.”
Competency Matrix
Competency AI Governance Facilitator Mediator CDS Adjudicator
Level high medium low not a core focus
Level 1

Shared Foundations

All five qualifications share a common competency foundation. It forms the basis of all professional conflict work — regardless of the specific role mandate.

This foundation is not a prerequisite but the subject of the qualification itself: it is systematically built, deepened and tested across different application contexts.

  • Communication — Understanding under conditions of tension, ambiguity and diverging interests
  • Conflict Analysis — Recognising structures, patterns and interests; classifying escalation dynamics
  • Facilitation — Designing processes that enable decision-making and mutual understanding
  • Mediation — Principles and basic logic of mediation between diverging positions
  • Governance — Structures, rules and institutions as a framework for conflict work
  • Decision-Making — Capacity to act under uncertainty and incomplete information
  • Law — Understanding legal frameworks and integrating them into conflict resolution
Level 2

Role Profiles

The five qualifications differ not primarily in content, but in their logic of intervention: what role does the qualified person take in the conflict? What is their primary mandate?

This question determines the orientation of the entire qualification.

RolePrimary Mandate
AI Governance & Conflict SpecialistGovernance, risk and conflict management in digital systems
FacilitatorDesigning communication, participation and decision-making processes
MediatorEnabling understanding between conflicting parties
Conflict Decision SpecialistStrategically assessing and deciding on conflicts
International AdjudicatorConflict resolution in complex project and contract contexts
Level 3

Specialisations

Each role develops its own depth on the shared foundation. This specialisation defines how the qualified person thinks and acts in conflict.

AI Governance & Conflict Specialist

Governance of Digital Systems

Conflict and risk management under conditions of algorithmic decision systems and AI-driven processes.

  • AI governance requirements and compliance
  • Algorithmic decision logics and their conflict potential
  • Digital transformation as conflict context
  • Interfaces of technology, law and organisation
Facilitator

Process Architecture

Designing complex communication and decision-making processes in groups, organisations and political contexts.

  • Participatory formats and process architecture
  • Group decisions under diverse interests
  • Anticipatory process design
  • Facilitation in institutional and political settings
Mediator

Structured Mediation

Professional competency in structured mediation procedures — with the aim of consensual solutions.

  • Mediation procedures under applicable law
  • Techniques for interests and positions work
  • Handling emotions and escalation in the process
  • Limits and prerequisites of mediation
Conflict Decision Specialist

Strategic Conflict Decision

Developing judgement and capacity to act in situations where mutual understanding is no longer sufficient.

  • Decision logics under uncertainty and pressure
  • Strategic conflict assessment in escalated systems
  • Taking responsibility under incomplete information
  • Interfaces of law, power and conflict
International Adjudicator

Binding Decisions in International Contexts

Competency for decision-making procedures at the international level — where understanding is no longer possible yet a decision is still required.

  • Foundations of international law and rules of procedure
  • Adjudication between conciliation and arbitration
  • Decision responsibility in cross-border contexts
  • Institutional frameworks of international proceedings
The decisive point

This is not about five different training programmes. It is about five different answers to one question: How must I think and act when conflicts have to be decided?